On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:01:39PM -0700, Andrew Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:17 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > The state machine didn't have a proper state for "not yet committed or
> > aborted", which meant that destroying an ovsdb_idl_txn without committing
> > or aborting it caused a se
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:17 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The state machine didn't have a proper state for "not yet committed or
> aborted", which meant that destroying an ovsdb_idl_txn without committing
> or aborting it caused a segfault. This fixes the problem by adding a new
> state TXN_UNCOMMITTE
The state machine didn't have a proper state for "not yet committed or
aborted", which meant that destroying an ovsdb_idl_txn without committing
or aborting it caused a segfault. This fixes the problem by adding a new
state TXN_UNCOMMITTED to the state machine.
This is related to commit 79554078d
