On 08/27/14 at 07:48am, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Are you sure? I think that the only real bug here is that if the
> timeout is negative *and* the "until" string is invalid, then there's a
> memory leak of the error message for the negative timeout. We should
> still fix that, and the same code change d
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:41:50AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Although the check is present already, a missing !error branch
> in the next condition prevents the error from being reported back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
Are you sure? I think that the only real bug here is that if the
time
Although the check is present already, a missing !error branch
in the next condition prevents the error from being reported back.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
---
ovsdb/execution.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ovsdb/execution.c b/ovsdb/execution.c
index 6314757..2be131d 10
