On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:11:41AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:11:24PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> >> For systems that do not use linker sections and also do not
> >> have either HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL or HAVE_
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:11:24PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> For systems that do not use linker sections and also do not
>> have either HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL or HAVE___THREAD (ex: windows
>> using MSVC), a COVERAGE_INC() calls xmalloc which
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:11:24PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> For systems that do not use linker sections and also do not
> have either HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL or HAVE___THREAD (ex: windows
> using MSVC), a COVERAGE_INC() calls xmalloc which inturn calls
> COVERAGE_INC() creating a recursion that
Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
From: Gurucharan Shetty mailto:shet...@nicira.com>>
Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:11 PM
To: "dev@openvswitch.org<mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>"
mailto:dev@openvswitch.org>>
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-thread: Break rec
For systems that do not use linker sections and also do not
have either HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL or HAVE___THREAD (ex: windows
using MSVC), a COVERAGE_INC() calls xmalloc which inturn calls
COVERAGE_INC() creating a recursion that causes a stack overflow.
This commit breaks the recursion by calling mallo
