On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:30:05PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> Currently, when we stop a daemon, we first send it SIGTERM.
>> If SIGTERM did not work within ~5 seconds, we send a SIGKILL.
>> After sending SIGKILL, we wait only for 4 second
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:30:05PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Currently, when we stop a daemon, we first send it SIGTERM.
> If SIGTERM did not work within ~5 seconds, we send a SIGKILL.
> After sending SIGKILL, we wait only for 4 seconds, before giving
> up.
>
> If the system is exteremely
Currently, when we stop a daemon, we first send it SIGTERM.
If SIGTERM did not work within ~5 seconds, we send a SIGKILL.
After sending SIGKILL, we wait only for 4 seconds, before giving
up.
If the system is exteremely busy, there is a chance that a
process is not killed by the kernel within 4 sec
