On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:18:45AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:48:27PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:38:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>> Groups were not dest
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:48:27PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:38:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> Groups were not destroyed until after lots of other important bridge
>>> data had been destroyed, inc
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:48:27PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:38:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Groups were not destroyed until after lots of other important bridge
> > data had been destroyed, including the connection manager. There was an
> > indirect
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:38:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Groups were not destroyed until after lots of other important bridge
> data had been destroyed, including the connection manager. There was an
> indirect dependency on the connection manager for bridge destruction
> because dest
Groups were not destroyed until after lots of other important bridge
data had been destroyed, including the connection manager. There was an
indirect dependency on the connection manager for bridge destruction
because destroying a group also destroys all of the flows that reference
the group, whic
