Jarno Rajahalme writes:
> Pushed to master, but not sure if need to backport to earlier
> branches, as meters are not really supported by any release yet?
Nope, we only hit this because our own ofproto provider actually does
support meters.
Thanks for this!
Petr
___
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:17:08PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> When deleting a bridge it is currently possible to delete a mater
> >> without deleting the rules usin
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> When deleting a bridge it is currently possible to delete a mater
>> without deleting the rules using the meter first. Fix this by moving
>> the meter's rule deletion to meter_
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> When deleting a bridge it is currently possible to delete a mater
> without deleting the rules using the meter first. Fix this by moving
> the meter's rule deletion to meter_delete().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> Reported
When deleting a bridge it is currently possible to delete a mater
without deleting the rules using the meter first. Fix this by moving
the meter's rule deletion to meter_delete().
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Reported-by: Petr Machata
---
ofproto/ofproto.c | 35 +++---
