On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
>> There is no reason to enforce padding after the last attribute.
>> Dropping this enforcement will ease efforts to implement zerocopy
>> upcall.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
>
>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> There is no reason to enforce padding after the last attribute.
> Dropping this enforcement will ease efforts to implement zerocopy
> upcall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
This looks correct from a userspace point of view, so:
Acked
There is no reason to enforce padding after the last attribute.
Dropping this enforcement will ease efforts to implement zerocopy
upcall.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf
---
lib/netlink.h | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netlink.h b/lib/netlink.h