On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:08:40PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> In most cases, tunnel ports specify a dpif name to act as the backing
>> port in the datapath. However, in the case of UDP tunnels the type is
>> used with the port number appended.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:13:15PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:08:40PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> > In most cases, tunnel ports specify a dpif name to act as the backing
> > port in the datapath. However, in the case of UDP tunnels the type is
> > used with the port number
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:08:40PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> In most cases, tunnel ports specify a dpif name to act as the backing
> port in the datapath. However, in the case of UDP tunnels the type is
> used with the port number appended. This is potentially a problem for
> IPsec tunnels becaus
In most cases, tunnel ports specify a dpif name to act as the backing
port in the datapath. However, in the case of UDP tunnels the type is
used with the port number appended. This is potentially a problem for
IPsec tunnels because they have different types but should have the
same backing port. Th