Thank you, I pushed this to master.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:33:32PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 15:27, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > The "speed_hi" member was only introduced in 2.6.27, so builds against
> > older kernel headers failed.
> >
> >
Looks good to me.
Ethan
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 15:27, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The "speed_hi" member was only introduced in 2.6.27, so builds against
> older kernel headers failed.
>
> speed_hi is fully backward compatible with older kernels, because older
> kernels always set it to 0, so we could eas
The "speed_hi" member was only introduced in 2.6.27, so builds against
older kernel headers failed.
speed_hi is fully backward compatible with older kernels, because older
kernels always set it to 0, so we could easily introduce a compatibility
layer here, but in fact I don't know of any OVS users
