On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:44:57AM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
> FAIL: detailed_contr_sw_messages.DeleteEmerFlow
> FAIL: message_types.QueueConfigReply
Without looking at the tests, I guess that these are probably both
genuine failures. OVS has never implemented the emergency flow cache,
and likely
On 10/17/13 3:23 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:32:55PM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
On 10/16/13 1:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
which seems to be a common path used
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> I did wonder if this solution is slightly sub-optimal as
> now the mutex is taken both in netdev_dummy_rx_recv()
> and netdev_dummy_rx_recv(). Then again, I'm not sure that
> it is critical to optimise netdev-dummy.
I agree, netdev-du
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:09:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:17:01PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
> > counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
> > which seems to be a common path used by all rec
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:32:55PM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
> On 10/16/13 1:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
> >counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
> >which seems to be a common path used by all received packets.
> >
> >P
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:32:55PM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
> On 10/16/13 1:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
> >counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
> >which seems to be a common path used by all received packets.
> >
> >P
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:17:01PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
> counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
> which seems to be a common path used by all received packets.
>
> Previously accounting was done earlier, in netd
On 10/16/13 1:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
which seems to be a common path used by all received packets.
Previously accounting was done earlier, in netdev_dummy_receive(),
however t
This alters the way rx packets are accounted for by
counting them when they are processed by netdev_dummy_rx_recv(),
which seems to be a common path used by all received packets.
Previously accounting was done earlier, in netdev_dummy_receive(),
however this does not appear to count packets that a
