Thx a lot,
Applied to master!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> Thanks for the fix Alex!
>
> Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto
>
> On 9/18/14, 5:09 PM, "Alex Wang" wrote:
>
> >Since dpdk_do_tx_copy() will be called by both pmd and
> >non-pmd thread, it should take the
Thanks for the fix Alex!
Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto
On 9/18/14, 5:09 PM, "Alex Wang" wrote:
>Since dpdk_do_tx_copy() will be called by both pmd and
>non-pmd thread, it should take the queue id as input.
>The current ovs always uses NON_PMD_THREAD_TX_QUEUE
>as queue id, which causes unprotec
Since dpdk_do_tx_copy() will be called by both pmd and
non-pmd thread, it should take the queue id as input.
The current ovs always uses NON_PMD_THREAD_TX_QUEUE
as queue id, which causes unprotected multi-access
to the same queue.
This commit fixes the issue by passing the queue id
to dpdk_do_tx_c
