On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> I mean that Justin says it isn't necessary to match on everything, so
> that we could easily get rid of the call to
> flow_wildcards_init_exact().
This turned out to be a bit more work than I expected. I just sent a new patch
("[PATCH v4] More
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:40:38PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:51:35PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:47:50PM
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:51:35PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
Use the offset of the last member in struct
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:51:35PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> Use the offset of the last member in struct flow instead of the
> >> struct size to help catch changes in
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> Use the offset of the last member in struct flow instead of the
>> struct size to help catch changes in the declaration.
>>
>> Add flow_random_hash_fields() used for testing in pl
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Use the offset of the last member in struct flow instead of the
> struct size to help catch changes in the declaration.
>
> Add flow_random_hash_fields() used for testing in places where
> struct flow was used without zero initiali
Use the offset of the last member in struct flow instead of the
struct size to help catch changes in the declaration.
Add flow_random_hash_fields() used for testing in places where
struct flow was used without zero initialization before.
With these changes we do not need to keep updating explicit
