Pushed,
Jarno
On Aug 15, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
> wrote:
>> It could be possible that the thread misses a signal when it reads the
>> change_seq again after reload. Also, the counter has no dependent
>> data, so the memory
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> It could be possible that the thread misses a signal when it reads the
> change_seq again after reload. Also, the counter has no dependent
> data, so the memory model for the atomic read can be relaxed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
It could be possible that the thread misses a signal when it reads the
change_seq again after reload. Also, the counter has no dependent
data, so the memory model for the atomic read can be relaxed.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 27 ++-
1 file
