I understand now. Thank you. This patch looks good, then.
Please add your explanation to the commit message.
On Apr 22, 2014 5:28 PM, "YAMAMOTO Takashi" wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:47:32PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >> Improve random distribution for an hmap with a small number o
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:47:32PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> Improve random distribution for an hmap with a small number of nodes
>> with the expense of the increased cpu cost.
>> It would be a fair trade-off because the situation is rather common
>> for bond, which is currently the only
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:47:32PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> Improve random distribution for an hmap with a small number of nodes
> with the expense of the increased cpu cost.
> It would be a fair trade-off because the situation is rather common
> for bond, which is currently the only consum
Improve random distribution for an hmap with a small number of nodes
with the expense of the increased cpu cost.
It would be a fair trade-off because the situation is rather common
for bond, which is currently the only consumer of this API in tree.
Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi
---
lib/hmap.c
