On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:03:16PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Make miniflow_pad_to_64() a little more robust with regards to updates to
> struct flow by passing the last field, whose end should be considered for
> padding, rather than the next field, whose start should be considered.
>
> Signed-
Sorry Ben,
I forgot about this and now I ran out of time.
Jarno
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:03:16PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Make miniflow_pad_to_64() a little more robust with regards to updates to
>> struct flow by passing the last fi
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:03:16PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Make miniflow_pad_to_64() a little more robust with regards to updates to
> struct flow by passing the last field, whose end should be considered for
> padding, rather than the next field, whose start should be considered.
>
> Signed-
Make miniflow_pad_to_64() a little more robust with regards to updates to
struct flow by passing the last field, whose end should be considered for
padding, rather than the next field, whose start should be considered.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
lib/flow.c | 18 +-
lib/util.