On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 01:57:05PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:20:27PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> > The logic to split up the list of datapaths into multipl
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:20:27PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > The logic to split up the list of datapaths into multiple Netlink messages
>> > was simply wrong, causing the list to be term
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:20:27PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > The logic to split up the list of datapaths into multiple Netlink messages
> > was simply wrong, causing the list to be terminated after the first part.
> > Only about the first 50
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The logic to split up the list of datapaths into multiple Netlink messages
> was simply wrong, causing the list to be terminated after the first part.
> Only about the first 50 datapaths would be dumped. This fixes the
> problem.
>
> Bug #9124.
The logic to split up the list of datapaths into multiple Netlink messages
was simply wrong, causing the list to be terminated after the first part.
Only about the first 50 datapaths would be dumped. This fixes the
problem.
Bug #9124.
Reported-by: Paul Ingram
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
datap
