On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> The checksum of ICMPv6 packets uses the IP pseudoheader as part of
>> the calculation, unlike ICMP in IPv4. This was not implemented,
>> which means that modifying the IP addresses of
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> The checksum of ICMPv6 packets uses the IP pseudoheader as part of
> the calculation, unlike ICMP in IPv4. This was not implemented,
> which means that modifying the IP addresses of an ICMPv6 packet
> would cause the checksum to no longer be c
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> The checksum of ICMPv6 packets uses the IP pseudoheader as part of
>> the calculation, unlike ICMP in IPv4. This was not implemented,
>> which means that modifying the IP addresses of an
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> The checksum of ICMPv6 packets uses the IP pseudoheader as part of
> the calculation, unlike ICMP in IPv4. This was not implemented,
> which means that modifying the IP addresses of an ICMPv6 packet
> would cause the checksum to no longer be c
The checksum of ICMPv6 packets uses the IP pseudoheader as part of
the calculation, unlike ICMP in IPv4. This was not implemented,
which means that modifying the IP addresses of an ICMPv6 packet
would cause the checksum to no longer be correct as the psuedoheader
did not match.
Reported-by: Neal S
