On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 21:55 , ext Pravin Shelar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarno Rajahalme
>> wrote:
>>> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
>>> protocols.
>>>
>> This
On May 7, 2013, at 21:55 , ext Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarno Rajahalme
> wrote:
>> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
>> protocols.
>>
> This approach is different from what tunnel upstream patches does.
> Since there is no li
On May 7, 2013, at 21:55 , ext Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarno Rajahalme
> wrote:
>> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
>> protocols.
>>
> This approach is different from what tunnel upstream patches does.
> Since there is no li
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarno Rajahalme
wrote:
> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
> protocols.
>
This approach is different from what tunnel upstream patches does.
Since there is no lisp support in kernel, this patch will make ovs out
of tree tunneli
Just one minor nit, otherwise this is a nice cleanup Jarno! See below.
On May 7, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
> protocols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> ---
> datapath/tunnel.c | 126
On May 7, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
> protocols.
>
I haven't reviewed this in detail yet, but when I tried to compile it on
Fedora, it
failed. The small incremental below fixes this on Fedora. I'll continu
This reduces repeated code and makes it easier to add new UDP tunneling
protocols.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
datapath/tunnel.c | 126
datapath/tunnel.h | 48 ++
datapath/vport-lisp.c | 167 --
