On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
>>> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:53, Ben Pf
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:45:31PM -070
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
Also, avoid using type larger than int
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>> Also, avoid using type larger than int in an enum, as it is not
>>> portable C.
>>
>> Did we establish that that w
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> Also, avoid using type larger than int in an enum, as it is not
>> portable C.
>
> Did we establish that that was the problem?
Haven't heard from Guru yet, took your word for
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Also, avoid using type larger than int in an enum, as it is not
> portable C.
Did we establish that that was the problem?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/m
After all, there are some cases in which both the insertion version
and removal version of a rule need to be considered. This makes the
cls_match a bit bigger, but makes classifier versioning much simpler
to understand.
Also, avoid using type larger than int in an enum, as it is not
portable C.
