Yep, I'll pull it back, if it's not trivial I'll send it out for review.
Ethan
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:27:47PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Commit bae7208e91a0 (bridge: Refactor bridge_reconfigure().)
>> introduced a regression in which th
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:27:47PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Commit bae7208e91a0 (bridge: Refactor bridge_reconfigure().)
> introduced a regression in which the switch would attempt to
> instantiate "null" interfaces in the datapath. This would, of
> course, fail and trigger a warning. Though
Commit bae7208e91a0 (bridge: Refactor bridge_reconfigure().)
introduced a regression in which the switch would attempt to
instantiate "null" interfaces in the datapath. This would, of
course, fail and trigger a warning. Though harmless, these
warnings confused users.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
Thanks merged.
Ethan
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:26:40AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> This issue has been around for quite some time. It doesn't really
>> cause problems beyond some spurious warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
>
> Loo
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:26:40AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> This issue has been around for quite some time. It doesn't really
> cause problems beyond some spurious warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
Looks good, thank you.
___
dev mailing
This issue has been around for quite some time. It doesn't really
cause problems beyond some spurious warnings.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
vswitchd/bridge.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c
index 077d9ee..037a4cb
