On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:59:36AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:53:23 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:58PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> > > However, the changes to vport-vxlan.c are modifying compatibility code
> > > that shouldn't be extended further. In
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:53:23 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:58PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> > However, the changes to vport-vxlan.c are modifying compatibility code
> > that shouldn't be extended further. Instead, just use the existing
> > VXLAN netlink interfaces that have
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:58PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
> [...]
> > datapath/vport-netdev.c | 3 +-
> > datapath/vport-vxlan.c| 17 ++-
>
> These changes aren't upstream yet. Please do t
On 09.06.2016 22:35, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 09.06.2016 18:14, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>>> wrote:
On 09.06.2016 04:33, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 09.06.2016 18:14, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> On 09.06.2016 04:33, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
>>>
On 09.06.2016 18:14, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 09.06.2016 04:33, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>>> wrote:
The remaining problem regarding offloads would be, that we by defau
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> Agreed, but what are we really getting by adding the port value? In
>> the case of the Intel hardware it isn't much as I can take advantage
>> of checksum offload if I just turn on th
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 09.06.2016 04:33, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> The remaining problem regarding offloads would be, that we by default
>>> get into the situation that without the specia
On 09.06.2016 04:33, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> The remaining problem regarding offloads would be, that we by default
>> get into the situation that without the special offloading rule the
>> vxlan stream will only be processed on one
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> Agreed, but what are we really getting by adding the port value? In
> the case of the Intel hardware it isn't much as I can take advantage
> of checksum offload if I just turn on the outer headers. Then I don't
> even need to enable the Rx
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 23:21, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2016 17:38, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
wrote:
>>>
On 08.06.2016 23:21, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 08.06.2016 17:38, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>>> wrote:
On 08.06.2016 14:51, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 17:38, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2016 14:51, Jiri Benc wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2
On 08.06.2016 17:38, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> wrote:
>> On 08.06.2016 14:51, Jiri Benc wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
[...]
> datapath/vport-netd
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 14:51, Jiri Benc wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
>>> [...]
datapath/vport-netdev.c | 3 +-
datapath
On 08.06.2016 14:51, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
>> [...]
>>> datapath/vport-netdev.c | 3 +-
>>> datapath/vport-vxlan.c| 17 ++-
>>
>> These chan
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:22:58 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
> [...]
> > datapath/vport-netdev.c | 3 +-
> > datapath/vport-vxlan.c| 17 ++-
>
> These changes aren't upstream yet. Please do that bef
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Yi Yang wrote:
[...]
> datapath/vport-netdev.c | 3 +-
> datapath/vport-vxlan.c| 17 ++-
These changes aren't upstream yet. Please do that before backporting them here.
However, the changes to vport-vxlan.c
Current Linux kernel git tree has included VxLAN-gpe implementation
author Jiri Benc
committer David S. Miller
commit e1e5314de08ba6003b358125eafc9ad9e75a950c (patch)
tree1e18cdabf1c9d9ef17e26c6480e629465447f77f /drivers/net/vxlan.c
parent a6d5bbf34efa8330af7b0b1dba0f38148516ed97 (d
19 matches
Mail list logo