On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:27:08PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
> > The newly added replication logic makes it possible for a monitor to
> > receive delete and insertion of the same row back to back, which
> > was not possible before. Add logic (and
I'm really puzzled about how this is getting to the list.
d...@openvswitch.com bounces for me. I had to change it to
dev@openvswitch.org to avoid that. I see that openvswitch.com is
registered to the Linux Foundation though.
___
dev mailing list
dev@ope
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:27:08PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
> The newly added replication logic makes it possible for a monitor to
> receive delete and insertion of the same row back to back, which
> was not possible before. Add logic (and comment) to handle this
> case to avoid follow crash reporte
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 20 September 2016 at 13:27, Andy Zhou wrote:
> > The newly added replication logic makes it possible for a monitor to
> > receive delete and insertion of the same row back to back, which
> > was not possible before. Add logic (and comment
On 20 September 2016 at 13:27, Andy Zhou wrote:
> The newly added replication logic makes it possible for a monitor to
> receive delete and insertion of the same row back to back, which
> was not possible before. Add logic (and comment) to handle this
> case to avoid follow crash reported by Valgr
The newly added replication logic makes it possible for a monitor to
receive delete and insertion of the same row back to back, which
was not possible before. Add logic (and comment) to handle this
case to avoid follow crash reported by Valgrind:
#0 0x00453edd in ovsdb_datum_compare_3
