openvswitch.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 12:32:10 PM
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fully initialize structures to accomodate non
C99 compilers.
I think that's the only viable choice. Let's do that.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:35:43AM -0800, Linda Sun wrote:
> The other way is to
age -
> From: "Linda Sun"
> To: "Ben Pfaff"
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:32:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fully initialize structures to accomodate non
> C99 compilers.
>
>
> Microsoft support se
Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:22:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fully initialize structures to accomodate non
C99 compilers.
I don't see how those work with any vintage of C compiler. You can't
just initialize any member of a union and expect the compiler to guess
which one you mean
Microsoft support seems to indicate that it always initializes the first member
of the union.
Linda
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Pfaff"
To: "Linda Sun"
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:22:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fully i
---
lib/ovsdb-types.h | 20
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ovsdb-types.h b/lib/ovsdb-types.h
index efd83a7..d3aa262 100644
--- a/lib/ovsdb-types.h
+++ b/lib/ovsdb-types.h
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ struct ovsdb_base_type {
/* No constraint
I don't see how those work with any vintage of C compiler. You can't
just initialize any member of a union and expect the compiler to guess
which one you mean.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:18:24AM -0800, Linda Sun wrote:
> ---
> lib/ovsdb-types.h | 20
> 1 file changed, 8 in
