It seems I don't get the purpose of introducing hindex into lib. Now I get it.
Thanks.
At 2013-07-17 01:08:16,"Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:46:22PM +0800, ZhengLingyun wrote:
>> As you have said in hindex.h, hindex need a high-quality hash function to
>> work appropriately. So
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:46:22PM +0800, ZhengLingyun wrote:
> As you have said in hindex.h, hindex need a high-quality hash function to
> work appropriately. So maybe these two kinds of hindex_head_node() are
> similar in performance.
No. The quality of the hash function ensures that each bucke
As you have said in hindex.h, hindex need a high-quality hash function to
work appropriately. So maybe these two kinds of hindex_head_node() are
similar in performance.
If unfortunately hindex meets a low-quality hash function, i think it will
depands on the hash function, which will more likely to
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:21:04AM +0800, ZhengLingyun wrote:
> hindex_next() shouldn't jump over different hashs in the same bucket.
> tests/test-hindex did not detect it, add a multipart_hash() method to detect
> it.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: ZhengLingyun
Thank you very much for finding the probl
hindex_next() shouldn't jump over different hashs in the same bucket.
tests/test-hindex did not detect it, add a multipart_hash() method to detect it.
Signed-off-by: ZhengLingyun
---
lib/hindex.c| 21 ++---
tests/test-hindex.c |7 +++
2 files changed, 25 insert
