OK.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:26:43PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> At this point things are being added too frequently for it to be of
> much use (for example, currently the most recent kernel that adds new
> OVS features is the unreleased 3.13 RC). To me, it seems better to
> include it in the do
Thanks for the review, I applied this to master.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)
wrote:
> looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: pritesh
>
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
>> Reported-by: Ben Pfaff
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
>> ---
>> FAQ | 23
At this point things are being added too frequently for it to be of
much use (for example, currently the most recent kernel that adds new
OVS features is the unreleased 3.13 RC). To me, it seems better to
include it in the documentation/log messages for individual features.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at
I see your point, but I'm still sure users will want to know. Do we
add new features in every kernel version? That is, can we say
something like "3.x is the latest kernel version that adds new OVS
features" or does that not make any sense?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:53:25PM -0800, Jesse Gross wr
I think we would need to have a pretty large matrix of features and
kernel versions as this is no longer just about closing a gap between
upstream and out-of-tree. For example, IPFIX support went into both
places at the same time but not all upstream modules support it. Same
thing for TCP flags and
Reported-by: Ben Pfaff
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
---
FAQ | 23 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 2508c8c..3df1c54 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -173,22 +173,17 @@ Q: Should userspace or kernel be upgraded first to
minimize do
looks good to me.
Acked-by: pritesh
On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Reported-by: Ben Pfaff
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
> ---
> FAQ | 23 +--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
> index 2508c8c..3df1c54 100644
>
Could we mention the kernel version that added support? It's going to
be the next question people ask.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:27:35AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Thanks for the review, I applied this to master.
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)
> wrote:
> > lo