Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Ben Pfaff
OK. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:26:43PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > At this point things are being added too frequently for it to be of > much use (for example, currently the most recent kernel that adds new > OVS features is the unreleased 3.13 RC). To me, it seems better to > include it in the do

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Jesse Gross
Thanks for the review, I applied this to master. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) wrote: > looks good to me. > > Acked-by: pritesh > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Jesse Gross wrote: > >> Reported-by: Ben Pfaff >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross >> --- >> FAQ | 23

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Jesse Gross
At this point things are being added too frequently for it to be of much use (for example, currently the most recent kernel that adds new OVS features is the unreleased 3.13 RC). To me, it seems better to include it in the documentation/log messages for individual features. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Ben Pfaff
I see your point, but I'm still sure users will want to know. Do we add new features in every kernel version? That is, can we say something like "3.x is the latest kernel version that adds new OVS features" or does that not make any sense? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:53:25PM -0800, Jesse Gross wr

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Jesse Gross
I think we would need to have a pretty large matrix of features and kernel versions as this is no longer just about closing a gap between upstream and out-of-tree. For example, IPFIX support went into both places at the same time but not all upstream modules support it. Same thing for TCP flags and

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Jesse Gross
Reported-by: Ben Pfaff Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross --- FAQ | 23 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index 2508c8c..3df1c54 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -173,22 +173,17 @@ Q: Should userspace or kernel be upgraded first to minimize do

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)
looks good to me. Acked-by: pritesh On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Jesse Gross wrote: > Reported-by: Ben Pfaff > Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross > --- > FAQ | 23 +-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ > index 2508c8c..3df1c54 100644 >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] FAQ: Update to reflect that tunneling is now in upstream Linux.

2013-12-17 Thread Ben Pfaff
Could we mention the kernel version that added support? It's going to be the next question people ask. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:27:35AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > Thanks for the review, I applied this to master. > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth) > wrote: > > lo