Thanks, I did want your opinion. I applied this to branch-1.10.
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:19:42PM -0700, Neil Mckee wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> If that was a question to me, then yes, I think it would be good to
> fix this on branch 1.10 too. The old code resulted in ifIndex==-95
> being offered to t
Thanks!
If that was a question to me, then yes, I think it would be good to fix this
on branch 1.10 too. The old code resulted in ifIndex==-95 being offered to
the sFlow module for traffic from a non-ifindex-port. -95 being the -errno
that the netdev replies with to indicate that it doesn't
Applied to master and branch-1.11, thanks. Do we need this on
branch-1.10 also?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:38:53PM -0700, Neil Mckee wrote:
> I learned how to squash patches...
>
> Change sFlow model to reflect per-bridge sampling. Before we were presenting
> a separate
> sFlow data-source (sa
I learned how to squash patches...
Change sFlow model to reflect per-bridge sampling. Before we were presenting a
separate
sFlow data-source (sampler) for each ifIndex-interface, and it was causing
problems with
samples that did not easily map to an ifIndex being aliased together and
breaking
