On 10/21/14 at 04:02pm, Scott Mann wrote:
> lib/libopenvswitch.sym.in | 4
> lib/libsflow.sym.in | 4
> ofproto/libofproto.sym.in | 4
> ovsdb/libovsdb.sym.in | 4
Scott,
Can you add the generated .sym files to .gitignore?
On 10/22/14 at 11:04pm, Scott Mann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I see the failure.
> >
> > I suspect that the root cause is something different that we should fix
> > separately. I spent a few minutes investigating, but I did not
> > completely isolate the probl
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:54:44PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:54:44PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Guruch
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > > > I seem to recall that there was a related b
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > > I seem to recall that there was a related bug a while back when we
> > > > added the existing shared lib
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > I seem to recall that there was a related bug a while back when we
> > > added the existing shared library support. I spent some time looking
> > > through the mailing lis
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > I seem to recall that there was a related bug a while back when we
> > added the existing shared library support. I spent some time looking
> > through the mailing list and the Git history, though, and I couldn't
> > find it.
>
>
> The reason that it bothers me is that, if I recall correctly, turning
> on building shared libraries actually causes every source file to be
> built twice, roughly doubling compile time. That's not a big deal
> when building for a distribution, etc., but it slows the dev cycle,
> which is a bi
[adding back ovs-dev]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:38:48PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:02:53PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > > These changes cause shared libraries to be built by default. In
> > > particular, lib/libo
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:02:53PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> These changes cause shared libraries to be built by default. In
> particular, lib/libopenvwitch.so, lib/libsflow.so,
> ofproto/libofproto.so, and ovsdb/libovsdb.so will be built. Original
> behavior of building static objects excusively
These changes cause shared libraries to be built by default. In
particular, lib/libopenvwitch.so, lib/libsflow.so,
ofproto/libofproto.so, and ovsdb/libovsdb.so will be built. Original
behavior of building static objects excusively may be accomplished by
providing the --disable-shared argument to co
12 matches
Mail list logo
