Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 07/18/2016 10:03:35 AM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Guru Shetty , ovs dev
> Date: 07/18/2016 10:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH, v2] ovn: Allow SNAT traffic destined
> to router ip
&
"dev" wrote on 07/18/2016 11:20:59 AM:
> From: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> To: Guru Shetty
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 07/18/2016 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH, v2] ovn: Allow SNAT traffic destined
> to router ip
> Sent by: "dev"
Guru Shetty wrote on 07/18/2016 08:03:52 AM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 07/18/2016 08:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH, v2] ovn: Allow SNAT traffic destined
> to router ip
>
> On 18 July 2016 at 0
On 18 July 2016 at 05:22, Chandra S Vejendla wrote:
> When router ip is used as SNAT IP, traffic destined to router
> ip should not be dropped
>
Thank you for the fix. You will need to add your Signed-off-by. Can you
also add a "Fixes:" tag in commit message. Since this is a regression, I
wonder
When router ip is used as SNAT IP, traffic destined to router
ip should not be dropped
---
ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c b/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c
index 7ce509d..78c3a7d 100644
--- a/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c
