On 3 September 2013 22:53, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Thanks, that's what I was looking for. Would you mind submitting the
> patch formally then? (I don't think you need to escape the semicolon
> though.)
Sorry was away on vacations..
Yeah, I will resubmit it then.. I kept semicolon as well to make it
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> But in RT kernel we have few usages of "raw"...
> viresh@blr-linut-001:$ ggrep raw include/linux/skbuff.h
> include/linux/skbuff.h: raw_spinlock_t raw_lock;
> include/linux/skbuff.h:static inline void
> skb_queue_head_init_raw(struct sk_buff_
On 31 August 2013 05:45, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is the actual symbol that we're finding in the RT
> kernel?
Its not about RT kernel really..
Following patch did this:
b0e380b [SK_BUFF]: unions of just one member don't get anything done, kill them
diff --git a/include/linu
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 August 2013 05:37, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Viresh Kumar
>> wrote:
>>> On 26 August 2013 21:59, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>>
This is compatibility code for older kernels so by definition it
doesn't e
On 28 August 2013 05:37, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 26 August 2013 21:59, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>
>>> This is compatibility code for older kernels so by definition it
>>> doesn't exist in current kernels. You can't just remove it.
>>
>> My mista
