Ben,
ok, but does it mean you completely reject recent attempt to implement OF
meters in kernel datapath (ab)using tc capabilities?
It is OF meter implementation that is the only feature on the list that was
worth mentioning since it is the only sensible OF feature that is (yet)
totally unimpleme
an express
yourself clearly.
--
Regards,
Vladimir
2016-06-19 19:25 GMT+03:00 Ben Pfaff :
> In what way do you intend to use tc capabilities to implement meters?
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:43:33AM +0300, Vladimir Shebordaev wrote:
> > Hello, guys,
> >
> > sorry for the s
16-April/069007.html
> [2] http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-April/069240.html
>
> Thanks,
> Deepanshu Saxena
> Tata Consultancy Services
> Mailto: deepanshu.saxe...@tcs.com
> Website: http://www.tcs.com
>
>
> To: Ben Pfaff
> From: Vladimir Shebordae
2016-06-08 6:29 GMT+03:00 Ben Pfaff :
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:10:50AM +0300, Vladimir Shebordaev wrote:
> > I would like to work on OF meter implementation. It is said to be
> > missing from both userspace and kernel datapaths, though it is
> > implemented in the prot
Hello,
I would like to work on OF meter implementation. It is said to be missing from
both userspace and kernel datapaths, though it is implemented in the protocol.
It is also said that attempts were made to implement it and the patches have
been declined for various reasons but they are stil
--
Владимир Шебордаев
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
