Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add some missing statistics.

2015-09-09 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, > From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@sysclose.org] > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 4:15 PM > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:49:12AM +0100, Timo Puha wrote: > > New stats for vhost ports are rx_bytes, tx_bytes, multicast, rx_errors and > > rx_length_errors. New stats for PMD ports are rx_dropped, r

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] dpdk: add support for v2.1.0

2015-09-07 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, > From: Puha, TimoX > Subject: [PATCH v3] dpdk: add support for v2.1.0 > > Update relevant artifacts to add support for DPDK v2.1.0 > - INSTALL.DPDK.md > - acinclude.m4: Change DPDK library name > - netdev-dpdk: Limit minimum mbuf size to to adapt to DPDK bug fix

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] dpdk: add support for v2.1.0

2015-08-28 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, Thanks for your comments. Some details inline. > From: Daniele Di Proietto [mailto:diproiet...@vmware.com] > >diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.md b/INSTALL.DPDK.md > >index 35dd9a0..39e1b5d 100644 > >--- a/INSTALL.DPDK.md > >+++ b/INSTALL.DPDK.md > >@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ OVS needs a system with 1GB huge

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] dpdk: add support for v2.1.0

2015-08-28 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, > From: gowrishankar [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > To have dpdk built with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA, we would need > -lnuma in above extralib. It would be helpful if we document this > as well (INSTALL.DPDK). Thanks for your comments. We decided to leave this new vhost n

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add some missing statistics.

2015-08-12 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Puha, TimoX > From: Weglicki, MichalX > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Di > Proietto > > >Do you know how much it is going to impact the vhost throughput? Other than >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add some missing statistics.

2015-07-13 Thread Puha, TimoX
Hi, From: Weglicki, MichalX > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Di > Proietto > >Do you know how much it is going to impact the vhost throughput? Other than > this the change looks good to me. > > I compared the results based on (OVS head) vs (OVS head + patch)