t 3:00 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > This is simpler and shorter than handling each of these by itself.
> > >
> > > CC: Niels van Adrichem
> > > Suggested-by: Alex Wang
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > > ---
> > >
d to use the larger function
bfd_forwarding() as it captures all possible exceptions and is properly
mutually excluded.
Signed-off-by: Niels van Adrichem
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif
sessions
such as 6 and higher), it worked well.
Signed-off-by: Niels van Adrichem
---
I consider the operational results (CPU overhead) from very short transmit
intervals the network administrator's responsibility, as the default values
offer a correctly functioning cpu-effective but s
different mechanisms may report up- and downtime without
interference by setting there respective bit to 1. Though I realize this
requires quite some work.
Best,
Niels
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:02 PM
To: Niels van Adrichem
improving the throughput of OVS. How do you think about that?
Best regards,
Niels van Adrichem
[1] http://www.nas.ewi.tudelft.nl/people/Fernando/papers/EWSDN2014.pdf
[2] https://github.com/TUDelftNAS/SDN-OpenFlowRecovery
___
dev mailing list
dev@openv
