ns() called on it at least once. Therefore, there's no
>> need to re-xlate slow path flows just to shove their packets through
>> the system.
>>
>> This also may fix a bug discussed here:
>> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-April/013670.html
>>
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:41:37PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 07:30:44PM -0700, Murphy McCauley wrote:
>>> Commit 796223f5 (netdev: Add new "struct netdev_rx" for capturing packets
>>&g
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:08:50AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 07:11:50AM -0700, Murphy McCauley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:28 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
>>>
>>>&g
mon Horman co-discovered and initially reported this issue.
Signed-off-by: Murphy McCauley
---
Discussed on ovs-dev under the subject "Possible Regression in 'netdev:
Add new "struct netdev_rx" for capturing packets from a netdev.'"
lib/netdev-linux.c | 18 +
On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:28 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 12 June 2013 07:04, Murphy McCauley wrote:
>> (Sorry this isn't an actual reply and is missing context -- I wasn't on the
>> list when it was originally posted.)
>>
>> Simon and I have been in touch a
(Sorry this isn't an actual reply and is missing context -- I wasn't on the
list when it was originally posted.)
Simon and I have been in touch about this, and I thought I'd share my findings
for what they're worth.
The problem is from the commit Simon mentioned
(796223f5bc3a4896e6398733c79839
