a lawyer to determine your rights as
> far as patents go.
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:11 PM, John Xiao wrote:
>> Thanks Jesse!
>>
>> That's true that there is no such patch yet.
>> Pravin just mentioned "I will send out OVS userspace patch on ovs-dev
>
code is generally licensed under Apache 2 but I don't think
> anyone has proposed such patches to date.
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:07 PM, John Xiao wrote:
>> Thanks Ben!
>>
>> For user space tunneling patches, I guess they will be under Apache
>> Licen
800, John Xiao wrote:
>> One question on STT IP, is it free to use STT in commercial products?
>> I believe Nicira has patents on this.
>
> Assuming that Nicira does, the patches are being offered by the patent
> holder under GPLv2, see http://en.swpat.or
Thanks Pravin for sharing the patch.
One question on STT IP, is it free to use STT in commercial products?
I believe Nicira has patents on this.
Thanks,
John
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 20
-Original Message-
>> From: John Xiao [mailto:johnxiao.cl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:46 PM
>> To: Traynor, Kevin
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK support technical direction
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> The performance number
k at the rates that Madhu
> Challa presented at the OVS Fall Conference on Slide 3
> http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/18/1600-ovs_perf.pptx
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of John Xiao
&
Hi,
As we know that Intel stopped its effort on OVDK and OVS DPDK support
will all be in OVS upstream, and I have one question after digging
OVDK and OVS DPDK architecture:
- IMHO, OVS DPDK support can follow the existing "fast/slow path"
model as being done in OVS linux kernel, i.e. just another
