On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:34:07PM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:25AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> >> STT patches were posted on netdev mailing list, But it was rejected.
> >&
t is used in production and it can be useful for community, we can
> make exception for STT and maintain it in OVS repo.
> If anyone has objection to merging STT support let us know.
What is preventing the upstream merge?
--
John W. LinvilleSomeday the world will need a h
- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk
> +ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdki -- set Interface dpdk1 type=dpdk
Drive-by comment -- is that supposed to be "dpdki"? Or should it be "dpdk1"?
--
John W. LinvilleSomeday the world will need a hero, and you
linvi...@tuxdrive
with the split that is there
> >already.
>
> It is not a split. It is just a completion of a model. Adding missing
> parts. At least I see it that way.
I probably wouldn't call it a 'split' either. But, I agree with
Jamal that we are nowhere near consensus so far.
