Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> In the OVS datapath we clear the skb hash whenever we change any of the
> fields that may be used to compute it. This guarantees that any given flow
> will get the same hash value when assigning packets to bond interfaces based
> on the skb hash. If the hash is not clea
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > Clear the skb hash when it does not reflect the actual header values
> > any more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertio
David Miller wrote:
> From: Konstantin Khlebnikov
> Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:21:46 +0300
>
> > Skb_gso_segment() uses skb control block during segmentation.
> > This patch adds 32-bytes room for previous control block which
> > will be copied into all resulting segments.
> >
> > This patch fix
Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 10/21/15 at 11:34am, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > > #define OVS_CS_F_REPLY_DIR 0x08 /* Flow is in the reply
> > > direction. */
> > > #define OVS_CS_F_INVALID 0x10 /* Could not
Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Extend OVS conntrack interface to cover NAT. New nested
> OVS_CT_ATTR_NAT may be used to include NAT with a CT action. A bare
> OVS_CT_ATTR_NAT only mangles existing connections. If
> OVS_NAT_ATTR_SRC or OVS_NAT_ATTR_DST is included within the nested
> attributes, new (
Thomas Graf wrote:
> Copying ovs-dev mailing list and thus qutoing full message.
>
> On 01/14/15 at 01:14pm, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was testing 3.19-rc4 with openvswitch and encountered the splat below.
>
> What version of OVS are you using? Did this work properly with rc3
Du Fan wrote:
> Sorry for resend this mail, because my company email is rejected by netdev.
>
>
> Hi Florian
>
> 214 static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
> 215 {
> 216 netdev_features_t features;
> 217 struct sk_buff *segs;
> 218 int ret = 0;
> 219
> 220 /
Thomas Graf wrote:
> Benchmark
> * pktgen -> ovs internal port
> * 5M pkts, 5M flows
> * 4 threads, 8 cores
>
> Before:
> Result: OK: 67418743(c67108212+d310530) usec, 500 (9000byte,0frags)
> 74163pps 5339Mb/sec (5339736000bps) errors: 0
[..]
> After:
> Result: OK: 24229690(c24127165+
