Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/08/2016 11:31:54 PM:
> From: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS, Ryan
Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 09/08/2016 11:32 PM
> Subject: [PATCH v2]
Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 07/18/2016 07:50:50 AM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/18/2016 07:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] OVN: Fix ARP request flow in
> router ingress table
&
Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 07/18/2016 10:03:35 AM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Guru Shetty , ovs dev
> Date: 07/18/2016 10:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH, v2] ovn: Allow SNAT traffic destined
> to router ip
&
Guru Shetty wrote on 07/18/2016 08:03:52 AM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 07/18/2016 08:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH, v2] ovn: Allow SNAT traffic destined
> to router ip
>
> On 18 July 2016 at 0
Hi Guru,
I am fine with the changes. You can go ahead and apply them.
Thanks,
Chandra
Guru Shetty wrote on 06/22/2016 09:39:17 AM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 06/22/2016 09:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH
quire
that the router send out the packet on the same interface it came in after
applying the NAT rules.
Thanks,
Chandra
Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 03/25/2016 10:15:22 AM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> To: Chandra Sekhar Vejendla/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Dat
rther
processing, the packet will be sent out of port PVM2 to VM2.
[OUT PVM2]: m_net1, 198.44.1.3 -> m_vm2, 10.1.1.4
VM 10.1.1.4 responds to 198.44.1.3
[IN PVM2]: m_vm2, 10.1.1.4 -> m_net1, 198.44.1.3
The return path from 10.1.1.4 --> 198.44.1.3 will follow the exact same
path a
