On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 07:16:47PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
[...]
>
> Alexei, I believe you said previously said that SW should not dictate
> HW models. I agree with this, but also believe the converse is true--
> HW shouldn't dictate SW model. This is really why I'm raising the
> question of wha
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:18:59PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Dummy switch implementation using switchdev interface
>
[...]
> + if (!data || !data[IFLA_DYMMYSWPORT_PHYS_SWITCH_ID])
[...]
> + dsp->psid.id_len = nla_len(data[IFLA_DYMMYSWPORT_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]);
> + memcpy(dsp->psid.id, nla
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:19:56PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 08/26/14 at 11:54am, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > It is easy to *say* it could be added later, but connecting to software
> > forwarding in the kernel outside of OVS (which is important to some)
> > would take sig
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:44:59PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:29:10PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
> >On 08/26/14 11:22, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >
> >>I do not think that really matters. Phase one is flows. After that we
> >>can focus on l2/l3. If we would be able to fit in in
as Graf
Seems reasonable.
Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek
> ---
> utilities/ovs-ctl.in | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/utilities/ovs-ctl.in b/utilities/ovs-ctl.in
> index 0735160..2f39519 100755
> --- a/utilities/ovs-ctl.in
> +++ b/u
