The original message was received at Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:20:38 +0530 from
unimelb.edu.au [204.38.130.197]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
dev@openvswitch.org
- Transcript of the session follows -
... while talking to 12.227.76.54:
554 5.0.0 Service unavaila
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:30:41AM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>> wrote:
>> > In order to use rtnetlink to create new tunnel vports, the backported
>> > tunne
> From: "Lance Richardson"
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 12:38:49 PM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ovn-southbound: implement read-only
> connection support
>
> Add a connection table to the southbound db schema, similar
> to the Open_vSwitch "Manager" table.
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:30:41AM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> wrote:
> > In order to use rtnetlink to create new tunnel vports, the backported
> > tunnels require some code that was removed from their upstream version,
> > mainly
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Oct 19, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:35:27PM +0200, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >>
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> > On
When bridge uses the interface notifier, it wakes up until a reconfiguration
takes place. However, if there is no connection or a lock contention to the
database, the check for reconfiguration will not take place.
This uses a seq and only seq_wait when checking for the interfaces change.
This is
On 10/25/2016 03:15 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:36 PM
>> To: Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash
>> Cc: Christian Ehrhardt ; ychen
>> ; dev@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs
Adds a new "read_only" column for remote connections.
Operations that would alter the state of the database are not
permitted on connections for which the "read_only" column is set
to "true".
Signed-off-by: Lance Richardson
---
ovsdb/jsonrpc-server.c | 7 --
ovsdb/jsonrpc-server.h | 1 +
Add a connection table to the southbound db schema, similar
to the Open_vSwitch "Manager" table.
Add tests for pssl: and ptcp: read-only connection types.
Add support to ovn-sbctl for listing the SB Connection table.
Potential future work:
- Test cases for other connection types (punix, ssl,
Add read-only connection support for "remote=db:" connection type to
ovsdb-server.
Implement connection table with read-only attribute in southbound db.
Lance Richardson (2):
ovsdb: implement read-only remote connection type
ovn-southbound: implement read-only connection support
ovn/ovn-sb.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Lance Richardson
wrote:
> > From: "Russell Bryant"
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:12:32 AM
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn/TODO: Remove completed IPAM item.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant
> > ---
> > ovn/TODO | 5 -
> From: "Russell Bryant"
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:12:32 AM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn/TODO: Remove completed IPAM item.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant
> ---
> ovn/TODO | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn/TODO b/ovn/TOD
Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant
---
ovn/TODO | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ovn/TODO b/ovn/TODO
index 7d071d3..b719cfd 100644
--- a/ovn/TODO
+++ b/ovn/TODO
@@ -37,11 +37,6 @@ Russell Bryant: "Today that would require creating 4096
ports for
the VM and attach to 4096 OVN n
>-Original Message-
>From: Aaron Conole [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:36 PM
>To: Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash
>Cc: Christian Ehrhardt ; ychen
>; dev@openvswitch.org
>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs dpdk] why all the ovs threads pinned to master
>lcore?
>
>"Bodireddy
"Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash" writes:
>>
>>++ pidof ovs-vswitchd
>>+ ps -To tid,pid,psr,comm -p 25932
>> TID PID PSR COMMAND
>>25932 25932 1 ovs-vswitchd
>>25934 25932 0 eal-intr-thread
>>25935 25932 1 dpdk_watchdog1
>>25936 25932 2 vhost_thread2
>>25937 25932 1 pdump-thread
>>25938 2593
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Stephen Fincane wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 16:09 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Stephen Finucane
> > wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
>
> [snip]
>
> > > +The advantage of hardware integration is not only
>
>sorry, I am still confused.
>when I launched vswitchd with dpdk-init=false, all the threads changed their
>pinned cores as time goes by.
>The following output is from ovs version 2.6 with dpdk-init=false ps -To
>tid,pid,psr,comm -p 5922
> TIDPID PSR COMMAND
> 5922 5922 12 ovs-vswitchd
>
>++ pidof ovs-vswitchd
>+ ps -To tid,pid,psr,comm -p 25932
> TID PID PSR COMMAND
>25932 25932 1 ovs-vswitchd
>25934 25932 0 eal-intr-thread
>25935 25932 1 dpdk_watchdog1
>25936 25932 2 vhost_thread2
>25937 25932 1 pdump-thread
>25938 25932 8 urcu3
>25939 25932 2 ovs-vswitchd
>259
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:08 AM, ychen wrote:
> When launch vswitchd with dpdk-init as true, all the handler threads and
> revalidator threads are pinned to master lcore and can not change their
> pinned cores when time goes by.
> so here is my problem:
> 1. with the same ovs code, there is diffe
19 matches
Mail list logo
