When QinQ is supported, ingress VLAN are kept after push_vlan actions,
so we should expect two VLAN headers.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang
---
tests/ofproto-dpif.at | 128 +++---
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/ofprot
Add dot1q-tunnel ports and ingress packet cases, in ofproto-dpif.at VLAN
handling.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang
---
tests/ofproto-dpif.at | 110 +-
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/ofproto-dpif.at b/tests/ofproto-d
"dev" wrote on 06/25/2016 08:38:09 PM:
> From: John McDowall
> To: "dev@openvswitch.org"
> Date: 06/25/2016 08:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] SFC summary?
> Sent by: "dev"
>
> Ryan,
>
> Thanks for putting together the summary - I have a simple VNF case
> working with a BiW VNF - very minimal t
Hello!
We are looking for employees working remotely.
My name is Christian, am the personnel manager of a large International company.
Most of the work you can do from home, that is, at a distance.
Salary is $2500-$5000.
If you are interested in this offer, please visit
Our Site
Best regards!
Ryan,
Thanks for putting together the summary - I have a simple VNF case working with
a BiW VNF - very minimal testing. I have added the logic to support multiple
port-pairs but have not tested yet. I have included a dump of the flows. The
code is posted to https://github.com/doonhammer/ovs the
Hui Kang/Watson/IBM wrote on 06/25/2016 07:53:36 PM:
> From: Hui Kang/Watson/IBM
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff , dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 06/25/2016 07:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [OVN] Potential scalability bug in ovn-northd
> on creating and binding large number of lport
> >
> > Actually, I take that back. The cycles/port for all the cases above
> > demonstrate only slightly nonlinear scaling: 200/25 is 8 Mcycles/port,
> > 1200/125 is 9.6 Mcycles/port.
> >
> > So the issue is not that it does not scale. The issue is that it is
> > slow.
>
> Er? When I do the rati
On 22 June 2016 at 15:44, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:19:40PM -0700, Ansis Atteka wrote:
> > Currently Open vSwitch is unable to create or connect to Unix Domain
> > Sockets outside designated 'run' directory, because of fear of potential
> > remote exploits where a hacked remot
Currently Open vSwitch is unable to create or connect to Unix Domain
Sockets outside designated 'run' directory, because of fear of potential
remote exploits where a hacked remote OVSDB manager would tell Open vSwitch
to connect to a unix domain socket owned by other daemon on the same
hypervisor.
Hello!
We are looking for employees working remotely.
My name is Kevin, am the personnel manager of a large International company.
Most of the work you can do from home, that is, at a distance.
Salary is $2500-$5000.
If you are interested in this offer, please visit
Our Site
Best regards!
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: William Tu
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It's a pretty common pattern so create a function for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/dpif-netdev.c| 6 ++
> lib/jsonrpc.c| 2 +-
> lib/ovsdb-error.c
Hi Cascardo,
Thanks for your feedback.
I did a couple of more tests and I think it should be valgrind's false
positive. Even for testcase 1 (TESTSUITEFLAGS='1'), my valgrind
complains about this case as "possible lost."
On the other hand, I do check and make sure that we only called the
name_tabl
Hello!
We are looking for employees working remotely.
My name is Wesley, am the personnel manager of a large International company.
Most of the work you can do from home, that is, at a distance.
Salary is $2500-$5000.
If you are interested in this offer, please visit
Our Site
Best regards!___
Commit 1895cc8dbb64 ("dpif-netdev: create batch object") introduces
batch process functions and 'struct dp_packet_batch' to associate with
batch-level metadata. This patch applies the packet batch object to
the netdev provider interface (dummy, Linux, BSD, and DPDK) so that
batch APIs can be used
"dev" wrote on 06/24/2016 10:56:04 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Hui Kang/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 06/24/2016 10:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [OVN] Potential scalability bug in ovn-northd
> on creating and binding large number of lports
> Sent by: "dev"
>
> On Fri, Jun
The original message was received at Sat, 25 Jun 2016 19:15:42 +0800
from nvidia.com [142.52.244.144]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
- Transcript of session follows -
while talking to openvswitch.org.:
>>> MAIL From:tbergst...@nvidia.com
<<< 501 tbergst.
Hello!
We are looking for employees working remotely.
My name is Randi, am the personnel manager of a large International company.
Most of the work you can do from home, that is, at a distance.
Salary is $2500-$5000.
If you are interested in this offer, please visit
Our Site
Best regards!
17 matches
Mail list logo
