Guys,
If using OVS 2.5 with DPDK 2.2, on Ubuntu Xenial, it is possible to crash
the OVS running at the host, from inside of a KVM Guest.
Basically, what I'm trying to do, is to run OVS+DPDK at the host, and
also, inside of a KVM Guest, with multi-queue, but it doesn't work and
crashes.
Soon a
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:51:29AM -0700, Dennis Sam wrote:
> > Extend the Global table to allow for additional configurations by
> re-using
> > the idea of an other_config column.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Sam
>
> Seems fine to me.
>
> >
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 04:08:42PM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Definitely lost is reported by test 2026: ovn -- 3 HVs, 1 LS, 3 lports/HV.
> ds_put_char__ (dynamic-string.c:82)
> ds_put_char (dynamic-string.h:88)
> process_escape_args (process.c:103)
> main (ovn-nbctl.c:92)
> Another leak sho
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> As per the delete_op_init{,__}() functions, the UFID should only be
> passed down if ukey->ufid_present is set. Otherwise it is possible to
> request a flow modification only using a UFID in a datapath that doesn't
> support UFID, whic
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:33:07AM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Reported by test 1657: ovsdb-server/add-db and remove-db.
> ds_put_format (dynamic-string.c:142)
> query_db_remotes (ovsdb-server.c:798)
> reconfigure_remotes (ovsdb-server.c:988)
> main_loop (ovsdb-server.c:156)
>
> Signed-off-
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:13:13PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> > +free(remotes_error);
>
> Shouldn't this be
>
> if (remotes_error) {
> free(remotes_error);
> }
No. free() is a no-op when passed a NULL pointer.
___
dev mailing list
Message could not be delivered
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
The original message was included as attachment
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi Ben,
Thanks, I applied diff below. Unfortunately it makes no difference.
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ udpif_create(struct dpif_backer *backer, struct dpif
*dpif)
atomic_init(&udpif->n_flows, 0);
atomic_init(&udpif->n_flow
This message was not delivered due to the following reason(s):
Your message was not delivered because the destination server was
not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely the
thank you. I submit patch v2 here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/622297/
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:30:14PM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > > --- a/ovn/utilities/ovn-sbctl.c
> > > > +++ b/ovn
Definitely lost is reported by test 2026: ovn -- 3 HVs, 1 LS, 3 lports/HV.
ds_put_char__ (dynamic-string.c:82)
ds_put_char (dynamic-string.h:88)
process_escape_args (process.c:103)
main (ovn-nbctl.c:92)
Another leak shown at ovn-sbctl.c with similar pattern.
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
That's a really weird one.
This is for an unusual code path: it's an OpenFlow packet-out, that gets
executed via dpif_netdev, which causes recirculation, which installs a
new datapath flow. I wonder whether somehow this bypasses a normal
initialization step through some weirdness.
Does it make a
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:51:29AM -0700, Dennis Sam wrote:
> Extend the Global table to allow for additional configurations by re-using
> the idea of an other_config column.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Sam
Seems fine to me.
> - "version": "1.5.1"}
> + "version": "1.5.2"}
Though it doesn't mak
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:58:43AM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Fix two errors reported by test 2026: ovn -- 3 HVs, 1 LS, 3 lports/HV.
> 1. Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> physical_run (physical.c:366)
> main (ovn-controller.c:382)
> 2. Use of uninitialised value
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:30:14PM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > --- a/ovn/utilities/ovn-sbctl.c
> > > +++ b/ovn/utilities/ovn-sbctl.c
> > > @@ -973,6 +973,7 @@ do_sbctl(const char *args, struct ctl_command
> > > *commands, size_t n_commands,
> > > fr
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 03:40:56PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> "dev" wrote on 04/22/2016 07:45:03 PM:
>
> > From: Ben Pfaff
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: Ben Pfaff
> > Date: 04/22/2016 07:45 PM
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ofproto-dpif-xlate: Always generate wildcards.
> > Sent by: "dev"
Thanks for testing. I applied this to master and branch-2.5.
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 04:21:45PM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Hi Ben and Ryan,
>
> I've tested this patch and the "Conditional jump or move depends on
> uninitialised value(s)" problem caused by xlate_actions() is resolved.
> However,
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:31:19AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Flavio Leitner wr
This message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message could not be delivered because the destination server was
unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely the
20 matches
Mail list logo
