> On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review;
> The suggestions are fine;
> I added a couple comments inline.
Great! Thanks for the patch. I pushed the change.
--Justin
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review. I have sent a second patch with signed-off tag. Please
review it again.
For your comments, I listed the answers of mine below:
1. "I worry that we'll end up with a fourth, and a fifth, ..."
With flow IPFIX, Bridge IPFIX and Port level IPFIX, we can handle almo
Thanks for the review;
The suggestions are fine;
I added a couple comments inline.
Darrell
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Apr 5, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> > This patch implements BUM support in the VTEP schema. This relates to
> BUM
> > traffi
This patch is superseded
I sent an updated patch with a couple bugs fixed in ovs-vtep
Darrell
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
> This patch series updates the vtep schema, vtep-ctl commands and vtep
> simulator to support source node replication in addition to service node
>
Offline discussion is documented in v1->v2 below.
There are various considerations to what kind of replication
configuration is needed and what is "better" varies with the
specific requirements. Feel free to suggest otherwise.
This patch series updates the vtep schema to support source node
replic
This patch series updates the vtep schema, vtep-ctl commands and vtep
simulator to support source node replication in addition to service node
replication per logical switch. The default replication mode is service node
as that was the only mode previously supported. Source node replication
mode
The neighbor entry expiry is only checked in dpif-poll
event handler, But in absence of any event we could keep
using arp entry forever. This patch changes it to check
expiration on each lookup.
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar
---
lib/tnl-neigh-cache.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertion
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
> This patch implements BUM support in the VTEP schema. This relates to BUM
> traffic flowing from a gateway towards HVs. This code would be relevant to HW
> gateways and the ovs-vtep simulator. In order to do this, the mcast macs
> remote
>
Thanks for incorporating the review comments. I noticed that V2 hasn¹t
been ACKED yet.
Acked-by: Sairam Venugopal
On 3/10/16, 5:33 AM, "Alin Serdean"
wrote:
>A PnP(plug and play) event will be triggered before trying to disable
>the extension. We could use this PnP event to prepare for deta
STT implementation we saw performance improvements with linearizing
skb for SLUB case. So following patch skips zero copy operation
for such a case.
Performance number for large packet TCP test using netperf.
OVS branch TCP Host0 Host1
versionGbps CPU% CPU%
Hi Paul,
Please see the comments inlined.
Thanks,
Sairam
On 4/18/16, 1:31 PM, "Paul Boca" wrote:
>Added OvsExtractLayers - populates only the layers field without
>unnecessary
>memory operations for flow part
>If in STT header the flags are 0 then force packets checksums calculation
>Ensure co
Offline discussion is documented in v1->v2 below.
There are various considerations to what kind of replication
configuration is needed and what is "better" varies with the
specific requirements. Feel free to suggest otherwise.
This patch series updates the vtep schema to support source node
replic
This patch series updates the vtep schema, vtep-ctl commands and vtep
simulator to support source node replication in addition to service node
replication per logical switch. The default replication mode is service node
as that was the only mode previously supported. Source node replication
mode
Thanks for looking in to the patch Kevin, please see my reply inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Traynor, Kevin
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 6:08 PM
> To: Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash ;
> dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Set pmd thread priority
>
> On 21/04
The "VLAN splinters" feature works around buggy device drivers in
old Linux versions. But support for the old kernel is dropped, So
now all supported kernel vlan drivers should be working fine with
OVS kernel datapath.
Following patch removes this deprecated feature.
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar
On 21/04/2016 16:16, Bhanuprakash Bodireddy wrote:
Set the DPDK pmd thread scheduling policy to SCHED_RR and static
priority to highest priority value of the policy. This is to deal with
pmd thread starvation case where another cpu hogging process can get
scheduled/affinitized to the same core wh
Hi Daniele,
some comments inline prefixed with [Antonio F].
Regards,
Antonio
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Di
> Proietto
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 1:03 AM
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 04/15] c
Ben Pfaff writes:
>> > want to make sure that the additional providers can be built without
>> > installing code that is available only under NDA.
>>
>> That is understood. The SAI backend will be optional.
>
> That's not exactly what I mean. I mean, there must be a way for users
> to compile
Hi Daniele,
below are
- Regression Tests results
- ALWAYS_INLINE check
Regression Tests on Performance
===
I did some regression tests on performance, it looks like there's
no performance drop.
I've sent mono-directional data with 64-Byte packets at line rate
o
Solved access violation when trying to acces netling message - obtained with
forged IOCTLs
Signed-off-by: Paul-Daniel Boca
---
datapath-windows/ovsext/Datapath.c| 45 +---
datapath-windows/ovsext/Flow.c| 42 ++-
datapath-windows/ovsext/Netlink
On Friday 22 April 2016 10:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:44:12PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Babu Shanmugam
Following are done through this series
1. Changed the old approach of policing the packets. It is now shaped
with queues. Changed the Logical_Port op
Dear user of openvswitch.org,
We have received reports that your account has been used to send a huge amount
of unsolicited email during the last week.
Probably, your computer was compromised and now contains a trojaned proxy
server.
We recommend that you follow our instructions in order to kee
The original message was received at Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:50:28 +0530 from
[205.105.134.93]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
dev@openvswitch.org
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/list
Hi everyone,
I'm new to OVS and i wanted to know which function that compare the flow of
a table with the flow of extracted from a packet.
Thank you and have a nice day.
Best regards.
--
Amrane Ait Zeouay
Engineer Student in The Development of Software and Systems
University of Western Brittan
Le 23/04/2016 19:28, Alexander Aring a écrit :
Hi,
On 04/23/2016 07:05 PM, Alexander Aring wrote:
...
if this is really needed, then nla_put_u64/be64/etc need to be changed also,
Okay, I found PATCH 3/9 do it for be64, but what's about u64?
It's also planned. I will send several "small" se
Hi,
I've recently run a lot into extremely huge logfiles.
I found it related to messages like:
2016-04-25T06:25:29.464Z|3|dpif_netdev(pmd18)|INFO|Core 9 processing
port 'vhost-user-1'
With many ports and queues set up it really gets bad with almost a Gigabyte
for 512 ports and even up to stall
From the manpages of getgrnam_r (getpwnam_r is similar):
"If no matching group record was found, these functions return 0 and
store NULL in *result."
The code checked only against errors, but non existing users didn't set
e != 0 therefore the code could try to set arbitrary uid/gid values.
*Updat
27 matches
Mail list logo