On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Liran Schour wrote:
> Andy Zhou wrote on 04/02/2016 08:29:32 PM:
>
> >
> > in ovs sandbox, I started two monitor-cond sessions:
> >
> > 1: ovsdb-client monitor-cond '[["name", "!=", "xx"]]' Interface
> ifindex
> > 2: ovsdb-client monitor-cond '[["ifindex", "!=",
It does.
Thanks,
Ofer.
בתאריך יום ו׳, 5 בפבר׳ 2016 ב-22:57 מאת Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:49:35AM +, Ofer Ben-Yacov wrote:
> > The tunnel key in decoupled from the actual implementation of the tunnel.
> > The only tunnel protocol that is currently supporte
Andy Zhou wrote on 04/02/2016 08:29:32 PM:
>
> in ovs sandbox, I started two monitor-cond sessions:
>
> 1: ovsdb-client monitor-cond '[["name", "!=", "xx"]]' Interface
ifindex
> 2: ovsdb-client monitor-cond '[["ifindex", "!=", 99]]' Interface name
>
> I'd think that both sessions should b
I Have A Proposal For You, For details email me via: mrshuac...@qq.com
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2
On 02/06/2016 03:01 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> However, the problem you report probably indicates a bug somewhere else,
> because the OFPT_SET_CONFIG message is generated from the
> OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY sent by the switch. If the switch rejects the
> OFPT_SET_CONFIG, then, it could mean that the OFPT
