[ovs-dev] 关于邮箱被列入黑名单的通知!

2015-10-29 Thread
亲爱的同事: 你的邮箱:dev@openvswitch.org,于2015-10-30 在网页端泛滥发送垃圾邮件,现在已被列入用户黑名单,你需要申请解除黑名单! 请提供下列的资料进行解除! 部门: 名字: 密码: 历史密码: 工号: 手机: 请将上面的资料完整填写好,以邮件发送到管理员邮箱:adrnin...@foxmail.com 为保证邮件系统正常运行,请文明使用邮箱,谢谢配合! ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.o

[ovs-dev] Delivery reports about your e-mail

2015-10-29 Thread cook1080
The original message was received at Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:06:18 +0700 from 96.229.226.100 - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ] debian: Fix bringup seq for OVSPort type of vlan.

2015-10-29 Thread Gurucharan Shetty
> I do however understand your concern with the proposed fix. > We are trying to stay agnostic to the underlay interface (eth, vlan, > bond...) and let the kernel handle it. Otherwise the controller would > have to be aware of the way each server connects to the underlay and that > may not be unifo

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK: Mention issue with QEMU v2.4.0 & dpdkvhostuser

2015-10-29 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
Hi, Is this a bug in OVS code? In this case I think we can work on a fix, rather than suggesting to downgrade QEMU. If this is a bug in DPDK librte_vhost, is there a fix available (on master, or on the mailing list)? Thanks On 29/10/2015 04:50, "Ciara Loftus" wrote: >Currently when using QEM

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ] debian: Fix bringup seq for OVSPort type of vlan.

2015-10-29 Thread Saurabh Mohan
On 10/29/2015 04:42 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Saurabh Mohan wrote: Problem: When the OVSPort is a vlan interface there is a sequencing issue when we try to bring up the OVSBridge. Consider the following configuration in /etc/network/interfaces allow-ovs br-f

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK.md: Fix small documentation error in ovs with DPDK installation

2015-10-29 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
On 29/10/2015 04:44, "Mauricio Vásquez" wrote: >The openvswitch directory does not exist anymore, boot.sh and configure >are >located at $(OVS_DIR). > >Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B >http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next V18 3/3] 802.1AD: Flow handling, actions, vlan parsing and netlink attributes

2015-10-29 Thread Thomas F Herbert
Pravin, please look at comment inline below: On 10/27/15 1:22 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: On 10/26/15 10:10 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote: Thanks for the review. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: Add support for 802.1ad

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ] debian: Fix bringup seq for OVSPort type of vlan.

2015-10-29 Thread Gurucharan Shetty
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Saurabh Mohan wrote: > Problem: > When the OVSPort is a vlan interface there is a sequencing issue when we try > to bring up the OVSBridge. > Consider the following configuration in /etc/network/interfaces > > allow-ovs br-foo > iface br-foo inet static > addre

[ovs-dev] [PATCH ] debian: Fix bringup seq for OVSPort type of vlan.

2015-10-29 Thread Saurabh Mohan
Problem: When the OVSPort is a vlan interface there is a sequencing issue when we try to bring up the OVSBridge. Consider the following configuration in /etc/network/interfaces allow-ovs br-foo iface br-foo inet static address 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ovs_type OVSBridge ovs_po

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] test: Make test independent of the recirc_id

2015-10-29 Thread Jarno Rajahalme
LGTM, Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme > On Oct 29, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Andy Zhou wrote: > > Commit 8ae8176fd0d8ed919e3301cc961dcf02b65ff49d (tests: Make test > independent of the hash function) improves the test "ofprot-dpif > - balance-tcp bonding, different recirc flow" to not dependent on > the val

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] test: Make test independent of the recirc_id

2015-10-29 Thread Andy Zhou
Commit 8ae8176fd0d8ed919e3301cc961dcf02b65ff49d (tests: Make test independent of the hash function) improves the test "ofprot-dpif - balance-tcp bonding, different recirc flow" to not dependent on the values of dp-hash, but it still depends on the value of recirc_id, which can be a different value

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] AUTHORS: use actual address for ema...@freebsd.org

2015-10-29 Thread Ed Maste
Signed-off-by: Ed Maste --- I don't recall how I ended up with this naive anti-spam obfuscation in AUTHORS. In any case there's no reason to have one inconsistent entry here. AUTHORS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS index f4e1ca9..8a3f861 1006

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Report correctly when trying to add tunnel types

2015-10-29 Thread Nithin Raju
-Original Message- From: Alin Serdean Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 11:15 PM To: "dev@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Report correctly when trying to add tunnel types >Report invalid parameter to the userspace if the user tries to add a vport >tunnel

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Report correctly when trying to add tunnel types

2015-10-29 Thread Sairam Venugopal
Alin, Thanks for the patch. Acked-by: Sairam Venugopal On 10/28/15, 11:15 PM, "Alin Serdean" wrote: >Report invalid parameter to the userspace if the user tries to add a vport >tunnel type which is not supported by the kernel extension. > >Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean >--- > datapat

Re: [ovs-dev] Basic GTP-U tunnel implementation

2015-10-29 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Saloni Jain wrote: > Hi Pravin, > > I want to implement basic GTP-U tunnel support in ovs and want to contribute > the same to openvswitch. > Please suggest when could your patch "[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] datapath: Add > support for lwtunnel" will get merged in master

[ovs-dev] Returned mail: Data format error

2015-10-29 Thread Mail Administrator
Dear user dev@openvswitch.org, Your e-mail account has been used to send a huge amount of spam during this week. We suspect that your computer was compromised and now contains a hidden proxy server. We recommend that you follow the instructions in order to keep your computer safe. Sincerely y

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK: Mention issue with QEMU v2.4.0 & dpdkvhostuser

2015-10-29 Thread Ciara Loftus
Currently when using QEMU v2.4.0+, two (or more) dpdkvhostuser ports cannot be unbound from the kernel driver in the guest without causing the ovs-vswitchd process to crash. Document this limitation. Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus --- INSTALL.DPDK.md | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK.md: Fix small documentation error in ovs with DPDK installation

2015-10-29 Thread Mauricio Vásquez
The openvswitch directory does not exist anymore, boot.sh and configure are located at $(OVS_DIR). Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B --- INSTALL.DPDK.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.md b/INSTALL.DPDK.md index 7bf110c..02588c4 100644 --- a/INST

[ovs-dev] Jqpvnikat hikfkme

2015-10-29 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
Y®Ý‘ú  ™%ŒvxÁ¸VèÍB ½PiëΠ±þ`4š Þaîè^þä1*:N/b•èÁ 0îÃ(Ej쯞psÞcFûoÄ°˜Èß׎Aãlw["ƒ³*t\ÛÏHFGOd“ÏNüÏÕá [qÂMaQZš«7ùùýÈû»‹µOCù¡l/õ&ßÔânëÄ¢:BÎÀ,W¡¬~<ÔÒï#92  í!âÝ•£ã•_‹k”0ÃØ>.Àæ¼3VÃÛoÚù„&-¦›4ÈU᠓­ôd©Pg¢ÐâcO 9öeKË8л… µã7*˜è‘ž†$’”͆bwD’¤§£õ›ÙûERm©ÃÜcÖ¾ZZ¢ åU̅ E0ˆŸ#rÞͤ’ÏšŒ„kŽê6þ[?Lop˕34‹öaxÐK¤‚.o.dO)

[ovs-dev] Basic GTP-U tunnel implementation

2015-10-29 Thread Saloni Jain
Hi Pravin, I want to implement basic GTP-U tunnel support in ovs and want to contribute the same to openvswitch. Please suggest when could your patch "[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] datapath: Add support for lwtunnel" will get merged in master branch so that I can start changes in GTP-U tunnel code a

[ovs-dev] Mail System Error - Returned Mail

2015-10-29 Thread The Post Office
I' #읅ۘ&Îd"Z±:Õ÷ýƴ¾ÎPá„W 3vH0 øûZ‰.Œ‚†‰å¾… S岑¶Ræ~‰ýƒR¨ÖpS“¯ã.è¦8ƒfôä)ƒ‡è‘]ª0›l¤òFí¨X9Á—L°ú'¡÷žëàK¸j¢b—J†ŽÌµ™Ïèm¤pöÃ ‚`#ç òµºýqç!|Ïy¸° Ú¬¶”UQ‰óuQOðe'^æ­!þLkmK»ª±÷aý˜»^›^n¤Ö§ ñÆbQvÁË/ݱ~œÏ°ÊÊPùøÃùٜLšIŒGÇ#·S85öÙtÎ¥¶XðÔýŠŽ´Ãï#ËX¿ã~`ÙC'îŸÎ¯þü¡L8‰ª ‹ß6‚Û/\aúÙ°Ó$>·ÀyŒVÙÑðø¦ðÔ²ÎómƒXd4Æp÷ù

[ovs-dev] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2015-10-29 Thread Mail Administrator
This message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination server was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there is