Hey Andy,
Sorry for this late post, just very interested in the feature
implemented in this series, one question below,
+
> +user_spec += strspn(user_spec, " \t\r\n");
>
In which circumstance will the option value be prefixed
by "\t\r\n"?
Is this some common parsing practice?
Thanks,
Alex
Hi,
I found the function atomic_store_explicit and atomic_read_explicit for
branch v2.3.2 not use volatile this cause some problems in multi-core
system.
should we merge these pathes to branch v2.3.2?
git log for branch v2.3.2:
8917f72 ovs-atomic: Delete atomic, atomic_flag, ovs_refcount destroy
