What is the status of the conntrack integration with respect to
availability in distributions? The lack of state tracking has blocked the
ability for us to get rid of namespaces for the L3 agent (because of SNAT)
and the filtering bridge between the VM and OVS (stateful firewall for
security groups
Le 15/02/2015 20:13, Thomas Graf a écrit :
On 02/15/15 at 11:06am, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 15 February 2015 at 07:08, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a écrit :
Right, it was more of a general sanity check which is likely unneeded.
I'm not aware of any particular case t
On 02/15/15 at 11:06am, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 15 February 2015 at 07:08, Nicolas Dichtel
> wrote:
> > Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a écrit :
> >> Right, it was more of a general sanity check which is likely unneeded.
> >> I'm not aware of any particular case that this handles.
> >
> > I a
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:51:31AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:14:28PM -0500, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:55:58PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:41:51AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > This is in preparation for supporting
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 01:58:21PM +0100, Rhaban Hark wrote:
> we want to achieve round-robin over different action-buckets in a group
> table. Since we expect packets with identical headers (same ip & mac
> address), the current implementation is not sufficient. As far as i know ovs
> is using the
On 15 February 2015 at 07:08, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a écrit :
>
>> On 14 February 2015 at 11:56, Thomas Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/14/15 at 12:13am, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
+static bool skb_has_valid_nfct(const struct net *net, u16 zone,
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
(TNB HQ) 129 Jalan Bangsar,
59200 Kuala Lumpur,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Ini adalah satu pemberitahuan rasmi daripada ibu pejabat daripada Tenaga
Nasional Berhad sempena Persatuan Air Malaysia (PAM) untuk memaklumkan anda
mengenai Hadiah Khas Eksklusif Tenaga Nasional Berh
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:14:28PM -0500, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:55:58PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:41:51AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > This is in preparation for supporting group mod and desc reply
> > > messages with an NMX selection meth
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:46:22PM +, Mark Kavanagh wrote:
> Patches that modify existing code can break expected behaviour.
> Flag this by testing the patch with 'make check' prior to submission.
>
> Furthermore, it is not sufficient to only test patches that add files
> using 'make distcheck
OpenFlow 1.3 is your best bet; it is well supported by OVS and widely
supported by other switches too.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:38:40PM +0300, Amer wrote:
> Thank you Ben
> This means I need to upgrade to a new openflow version,
> Which version you suggest.
>
> Best regards,
> Amer
>
> > On ١
[Sorry for the resend, I had to subscribe to openstack-dev first,
maybe worth removing the subscribe requirement for outsiders]
[Copying ovs-dev]
On 02/13/15 at 01:47pm, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot about
>
> 5) If we put all our OVS/OF bridge logic in just one bridge (instead
[Copying ovs-dev]
On 02/13/15 at 01:47pm, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot about
>
> 5) If we put all our OVS/OF bridge logic in just one bridge (instead of N:
> br-tun, br-int, br-ex, br-xxx),
> the performance should be yet higher, since, as far as I understood,
> flow rule
Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a écrit :
On 14 February 2015 at 11:56, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 02/14/15 at 12:13am, Joe Stringer wrote:
[..]
+static bool skb_has_valid_nfct(const struct net *net, u16 zone,
+const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ enum ip_conntrack_in
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 01:58:21PM +0100, Rhaban Hark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we want to achieve round-robin over different action-buckets in a group
> table. Since we expect packets with identical headers (same ip & mac
> address), the current implementation is not sufficient. As far as i know ovs
Thank you Ben
This means I need to upgrade to a new openflow version,
Which version you suggest.
Best regards,
Amer
> On ١٣/٠٢/٢٠١٥, at ٧:٣٣ م, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:27:48AM +0300, Amer wrote:
>> I am trying to change the size of VLAN tag, I have changed the size
>
Hi,
we want to achieve round-robin over different action-buckets in a group
table. Since we expect packets with identical headers (same ip & mac
address), the current implementation is not sufficient. As far as i know
ovs is using the hashed mac address to determine the selected bucket.
Base
16 matches
Mail list logo
