hi,
how about connmark support: save_mark and restore_mark?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
sorry, forgot the link
http://benpfaff.org/~blp/ovs-fields.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, loy wolfe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see in the doc[1] that there is pkt_mark field, but I didn't find any
> description in the ofctl manual. So, can I match against this field, and
> set it in the action?
Hi,
I see in the doc[1] that there is pkt_mark field, but I didn't find any
description in the ofctl manual. So, can I match against this field, and
set it in the action?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/de
An alternative interface, if we want this to be more flexible without
adding new parameters for each possible variation is something like the
following:
diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netlink.h
b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netlink.h
index f172590..e3d29a2 100644
--- a/da
Fixing issue where "resubmit" action in a group action set was not
considered sufficient to retain the full action set. This patch allows
a group action set (considered terminal with OF1.4 and earlier spec)
to have the "output" action come from a different table.
Signed-off-by: Srini Seetharaman