If a pop is composed on a flow whose label stack is already full
it should not call flow_push_mpls() as that function can't do
anything useful (it aborts) given that the label stack is full.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
Update the test for an MPLS pop on on a packet whose label stack going to
userspace to test that it goes to userspace, which is currently the case,
rather than being dropped, which was the case earlier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
tests/ofproto-dpif.at | 30 +-
1
Hi Ben,
This short series attempts to resolve two problems related to changing
flow_push_mpls() to use the slow path if there are two many MPLS LSEs
present.
1) In this case it is not safe to call flow_push_mpls() as
it can't do anything useful: there is no way to correctly
update the MPLS
Some functions pass a non-NULL value as this parameter
but none of those function uses the value xlate_receive()
returns there. So simply remove the parameter all together.
Also remove the now unused key_fitness field of struct flow_miss.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upc
This reworks lookup of rules for both table 0 and table action translation.
The result is that Table Mod settings, which can alter the miss-behaviour
of tables, including table 0, on a per-table basis may be honoured.
Previous patches proposed by myself which build on earlier merged patches
by And
Hi Pravin,
>> Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases.
At this point I wanted to get basic DPDK support in OVS, once that is
done
Looks good to me. This certainly makes it easier to get reproducible
performance results.
Acked-by: Joe Stringer
On 27 January 2014 16:50, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Before this patch, OVS tried to guess an optimal max idle time for
> datapath flows based on the number of datapath flows relative
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:57:10PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> When doing rule expiration, ofproto_rule_delete__() take the
> ofproto_mutex and calls rule_get_stats(). rule_get_stats() can do an
> xlate_actions() which may take the ofproto_mutex, causing a deadlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jac
When doing rule expiration, ofproto_rule_delete__() take the
ofproto_mutex and calls rule_get_stats(). rule_get_stats() can do an
xlate_actions() which may take the ofproto_mutex, causing a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 18 --
ofproto/of
Start with ovs-vswitchd and ovsdb-server.
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
v1->v2:
No change
---
lib/daemon.man |1 +
lib/service.man|1 +
lib/util.c |4
manpages.mk|6 ++
ovsdb/ovsdb-server.1.in|3 +++
The following code does not add any users yet.
The visioned workflow that this piece of code should work with is:
* Create a windows service through a startup script with
a tool like 'sc'
ex: sc create ovsdb-server binpath=
"C:\openvswitch\usr\sbin\ovsdb-server.exe -vconsole:off
-vsyslog:off -vf
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
index 24919db..ff979ba 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:39:00PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listi
More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
lib/entropy.c | 12 +---
lib/util.c| 16
lib/util.h|5 +
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/entropy.c b/lib/entropy.c
index fd73566.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:35:13AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> It might be even easier to use if it just returned char *.
Okay
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:35:13AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Looks OK to me.
It might be even easier to use if it just returned char *.
___
dev mailing list
More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
lib/entropy.c | 13 ++---
lib/util.c| 13 +
lib/util.h|5 +
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/entropy.c b/lib/entropy.c
index fd73566..f
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 03:47 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pravin,
>>
>> Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
>>
>> Few feature questions:
>>- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
>>- what's about IPsec support
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Pravin B Shelar
>>
>> Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
>> Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
>> where DPDK datapath switching
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:22:39PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:26:21PM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>> >> More users will be added in an upcoming commit.
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Vincent JARDIN
wrote:
> Hi Pravin,
>
> Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
>
> Few feature questions:
> - what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
> - what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
> I do not
On 01/28/2014 03:47 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
Hi Pravin,
Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I would like to extend this question to
On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
From: Pravin B Shelar
Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This
patch adds support for DPDK type p
Hi Pravin,
Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases.
This is based a patch from G
24 matches
Mail list logo
