(Letter to the President or Brand Owner, thanks)
Dear President,
We are the department of Asian Domain Registration Service in China. I have
something to confirm with you. We formally received an application on April 9,
2013 that a company which self-styled "Gop & Sun Investment Ltd" were applyin
I would really appreciate some feedback from people on netdev
on the issues described at the bottom of this thread.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:07:38AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:20:47AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Pravin B Shelar
> wrote:
> > diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
> > index 9cd4b0e..f0191ce 100644
> > --- a/datapath/datapath.c
> > +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
> > /**
> > * DOC: Locking:
>
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
> index 9cd4b0e..f0191ce 100644
> --- a/datapath/datapath.c
> +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
> /**
> * DOC: Locking:
> *
> - * Writes to device state (add/remove datapath, port, set oper
>> +/* XXX Finish Experimnetal BFD support.
>
> What part is experimental? (The protocol or the implementation?)
I consider the implementation experimental until we've tested it more
thoroughly. That said, it's a bit odd to put that in the code, so I've removed
it.
>> + * - CFM random VLAN opti
Thanks, merged.
Ethan
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:22:55PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
>
> Looks good, thanks.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:22:55PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
Looks good, thanks.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
tests/.gitignore |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tests/.gitignore b/tests/.gitignore
index 76b6fed..f6f113e 100644
--- a/tests/.gitignore
+++ b/tests/.gitignore
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
/test-packets
/test-random
/test-reconnect
+/test-sflow
/t
Currently OVS uses combination of genl and rtnl lock to protect
datapath state. This was done due to networking stack locking.
But this has complicated locking and there are few lock ordering
issues with new tunneling protocols.
Following patch simplifies locking by introducing new ovs_mutex
and n
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:36:01PM +0300, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Applied to master, thank you!
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c |5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index 8f00424..5c7d228 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
@@ -6435,11 +6435,6 @@ xlate_set_queue_acti
Currently OVS uses combination of genl and rtnl lock to protect
datapath state. This was done due to networking stack locking.
But this has complicated locking and there are few lock ordering
issues with new tunneling protocols.
Following patch simplifies locking by introducing new ovs lock
and no
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:27:05PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > Bug #15518.
> > Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
>
> Looks good to me.
>
Thank you. I pushed this to master.
___
dev mailing list
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:46:29PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
>> > index e9634fe..7b0f022 100644
>> > --- a/datapath/actions.c
>>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:29:52PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > Move execute_set_action from lib/dpif-netedev.c to lib/odp-util.c
>> >
>> > This is in preparation for using execute_set_
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:42:36AM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
> While not reported in the bug, I think the same should be done for LISP
> (UDP port 4341). Should I send a separate patch?
Yes, that sounds reasonable to me.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswi
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:27:05PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Bug #15518.
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Looks good to me.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:46:29PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
> > index e9634fe..7b0f022 100644
> > --- a/datapath/actions.c
> > +++ b/datapath/actions.c
> > @@ -617,6 +617,9 @@ static in
18 matches
Mail list logo