On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:28:35PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Hi Jesse, Hi Ben, Hi All,
> >
> > I have been working on reimplementing packet recirculation,
> > however I am a little unsure how to make facet revalidation work
> > for facets
I already applied it (as mentioned below).
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:45:55PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Looks good to me. Perhaps Andy should review it?
>
> Ethan
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > CC: Andy Zhou
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > I alre
Yes, the first option will be easier to implement. For the second option,
yes you are right. Implementing a dpif provider as Justin suggested is
also be a very good choice. Really depends on your design goals.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:54 AM, 王国栋 wrote:
> i think the first option may be impl
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> ---
> ovsdb/jsonrpc-server.c |5 +
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovsdb/jsonrpc-server.c b/ovsdb/jsonrpc-server.c
> index 6d07c45..16c4a76 100644
> --- a/ovsdb/jsonrpc-ser
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> ofproto/connmgr.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/connmgr.c b/ofproto/connmgr.c
> index b94c337..3200660 100644
> --- a/ofproto/
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Based on a face-to-face discussion.
>
> CC: Natasha Gude
> CC: Andrew Lambeth
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> vswitchd/vswitch.xml |5 +
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --gi
Looks good to me. Perhaps Andy should review it?
Ethan
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> CC: Andy Zhou
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> I already applied this to master.
>
> diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
> index 4b5e6fe..9613142 100644
> --- a/AUTHORS
> +++ b/AUTHORS
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Jesse, Hi Ben, Hi All,
>
> I have been working on reimplementing packet recirculation,
> however I am a little unsure how to make facet revalidation work
> for facets of recirculated packets.
>
> The problem that I am seeing is that as face
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Fixes behavior of
> utilities/ovs-ofctl parse-flow 'ip,ip_frag=any,actions=drop'
> and other cases that invoke this function on the ip_frag field.
>
> Reported-by: love you
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> AUT
Seems fine to me, I don't know this code well though.
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Until now, the OVSDB data journaling implementation has made write errors
> "sticky", so that a single write error persists as long as ovsdb-server is
> alive. H
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> ofproto/ofproto.h |1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto.h b/ofproto/ofproto.h
> index 3a66d1b..a217e0a 100644
> --- a/ofproto/o
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> vswitchd/bridge.c |3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c
> index ab0ecd6..993e4da 100644
> --- a/vswitch
Acked-by: Ethan Jackson
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I forgot that I was planning to backport this to branch-1.10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> I already applied this to master.
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index 90c01a6..b6800bc 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/N
Thanks, applied to master and branch-1.10.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
> Looks good,
>
> Thanks.
>> ---
>> NEWS |3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
Looks good,
Thanks.
> ---
> NEWS |3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index b6800bc..36fbf6f 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ post-v1.10.0
>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross
---
NEWS |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index b6800bc..36fbf6f 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ post-v1.10.0
-
- Stable bond mode has been removed.
- The autopath action has
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOTTO INC.
ADRESSE: OSTWESTLANDSTRASSE 1325
STADT: SILBERNER FRUHLING
STATE/PROVINCE: MARYLAND
POSTCODE: 20110
LAND: USA
INC.
REF NR: .364758679
STAPEL NR: .6485769789/646
This is to fix the fallout of single datapath change.
ovs-appctl dpif/show displays per bridge miss, hit
and flow counts on the screen, but the backend is
obtaining those information from the datapath.
With a single datapath, all bridges of the same
datapath would all display the same (global)
cou
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:18:11PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Currently we set a soft limit while defining the maximum size of
> core files. If there is already a hard limit set that is lesser
> than the soft limit we are setting, it will fail.
>
> Since our startup scripts start with root
Currently we set a soft limit while defining the maximum size of
core files. If there is already a hard limit set that is lesser
than the soft limit we are setting, it will fail.
Since our startup scripts start with root permissions, it looks
fine to set the hard limit directly instead.
Reported-
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:00:21PM +0530, Jagadish Nadimpalli wrote:
> In openvswitch, an interface is nothing but a "netdev". A port can have a
> single interface associated with it or multiple interfaces in case of
> bonding. Now, when it comes to applying QoS policies, the ingress policing
> is
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:27:41PM +0200, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Thank you! I applied this to master.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi All,
There is an un-closed socket as I was experimenting without restarting the
machine. So, this issue got resolved after I restart the machine. Now, the
VXLAN code works without any crashes. I have taken the master git.
Thanks a lot for all of your help.
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadish
On Sat,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
>
>> It is not obvious to me how the behaviour relating to get_priority() as
>> described above can sensibly be reconciled with a desire to preserve the
>> order of acti
Hi Jesse, Hi Ben, Hi All,
I have been working on reimplementing packet recirculation,
however I am a little unsure how to make facet revalidation work
for facets of recirculated packets.
The problem that I am seeing is that as facets are intended to be applied
to packets that have been recirculat
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index 5323626..742 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
@@ -5786,7 +5786,6 @@ compose_o
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOTTO INC.
ADRESSE: OSTWESTLANDSTRASSE 1325
STADT: SILBERNER FRUHLING
STATE/PROVINCE: MARYLAND
POSTCODE: 20110
LAND: USA
INC.
REF NR: .364758679
STAPEL NR: .6485769789/646
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
> It is not obvious to me how the behaviour relating to get_priority() as
> described above can sensibly be reconciled with a desire to preserve the
> order of actions. Or even reconciled with a looser constraint that actions
> that need l3+ data
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:54 , ext Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:12:22AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> Perhaps Ben has some ideas, but it seems to me that the
>>> way that execute_* and compose_* interact needs to be ch
Hi All,
In openvswitch, an interface is nothing but a "netdev". A port can have a
single interface associated with it or multiple interfaces in case of
bonding. Now, when it comes to applying QoS policies, the ingress policing
is applied to an interface where as the port level QoS has the egress
Q
i think the first option may be implemented more easily, in which i just
implement the datapath kernel module.
and in the second option, do you means that the whole project can be ported
to SE mode(including ofproto and vswitch)?
2013/3/10 Andy Zhou
> If you simply want a faster datapath impleme
31 matches
Mail list logo
